Most consulting projects fall into one of three buckets. I'd rather show you what each one actually looks like than sell you on a generic "engagement." Pick the one that fits your problem, or book a call and we'll work out which it is together.
Diagnose where your hiring operation actually leaks, and get a redesign plan you can act on.
I spend two to four weeks inside your operation, interviewing recruiters, hiring managers, ops people; reviewing your ATS data, your process documentation (or lack of it), your tool stack, your candidate funnel; sitting in on real interviews and real hiring decisions. Then I write the redesign: what stays, what changes, what gets killed, in what order, by whom.
You don't get a slide deck. You get a working document that maps your operation as it is, identifies the points where it's bleeding time, money, and quality, and lays out a sequenced plan to fix it. With me on call to help you execute, if you want.
Decide what to automate, what to keep human, and how to actually make AI produce results. Not just activity.
Everyone's selling AI for hiring right now. Most of it is repackaged ChatGPT, half-baked vendor pitches, or features that look good in demos and break in production. I help you cut through it.
We start with what your operation actually needs, not what's trending on LinkedIn. I map your funnel, identify the points where AI genuinely creates leverage (sourcing, JD generation, screening, outreach, candidate-job matching, interview prep, quality assurance), and tell you what's worth building, buying, or skipping entirely. Then I help you implement, either hands-on with your tooling stack, or in an advisory capacity working alongside your team.
I've done this work myself. The AI workflows I've designed are running in production right now. So when I tell you something will or won't work, it's because I've shipped it.
Spin up a new function (internal TA, agency expansion, nearshore presence) without the expensive mistakes.
I've done this twice end-to-end: a country branch from zero, and a multi-country nearshore operation from zero. Both ran into the same set of expensive mistakes that everyone running a new operation makes, and that nobody warns you about before you make them.
If you're starting something (an in-house TA function, a new geographic market for your agency, a nearshore tech delivery presence in Portugal or Poland) I help you skip the first six months of trial and error. That means: operating model design, tech stack selection, team structure, first-hire profiles, commercial model, the documents that hold it all together, and the unglamorous decisions about how this thing actually runs day to day.
This isn't strategy consulting. This is "I've sat where you're sitting, here's what to do."
PABC isn't a firm. It's me. No junior associates writing your deliverables, no account manager between us. You get my time directly, or you don't engage. This is a feature, not a limitation.
Long-term advisory makes sense after a defined piece of work. Before that, you don't know if I'm any good, and I don't know if I can actually help you. So we start with something concrete.
The fastest way to lose my respect is to pay me for work that wasn't going to help. If your problem is something I can't solve, or something a free tool would solve, I'll say so. I'd rather lose a small engagement now than waste both our time.
No tiered packages, no engagement minimums, no "premium support add-on." The work is the work. We agree on scope, you pay for the days I work, we adjust if scope changes.
Book the call and we'll work it out. Or take the diagnostic first. It'll show you which axis your operation is weakest on, which often points to which service makes sense.