You're probably in the worst quadrant in hiring and you don't know it
The most expensive quadrant in hiring isn't the slow one. It's the one where AI is amplifying decisions that were broken to begin with, and nobody can see it.
Short pieces on hiring operations, AI in recruitment, and the systems-thinking that keeps both from breaking. Written when I have something specific to say. Not weekly, not algorithmic, not for the feed.
The most expensive quadrant in hiring isn't the slow one. It's the one where AI is amplifying decisions that were broken to begin with, and nobody can see it.
Companies obsess over candidate volume when their real problem is that hiring managers can't decide, scorecards aren't calibrated, and offers go out three weeks late. More candidates won't fix that.
The reason most consultants in this space can't say "you don't need me" is because their P&L won't let them. Mine is built so I can. Here's why that matters.
A diagnostic for recruitment teams about to spend money on AI tools they can't yet use well. The three layers that have to be working before AI is useful, in the order they need fixing.
A diagnostic walkthrough for recruitment teams. What to ask, what each answer reveals, and where to look first when something is off.
No newsletter, no automation sequence, no curated bundle of "the week in AI." Just an email when a new piece goes up. Maybe once a month. Maybe less.